I have tried to correct it with Photoshop CS, I am using 5D with 24-105 f4. If someone can help, it will be appriciated. I just got this lens a week ago, but in most of the images, esp taken wide open, there is darkness/shadows at the edges/corners. Just needed a little help regarding my new lens 24-105 f4. I am new to this forum, but I have been following the website for last few years. My raw images in DxO never get converted until all my editing is done, and PT lens will be changing an image that I already thought was finished.Equipment & Techniques > Cameras, Lenses and Shooting gear That is, export a TIFF file out of Adobe Lightroom or your raw-processor of choice, then use PTLens on it before you dig into the final touches in your raster image editor." " PT Lens doesn’t support working with raw image files, so I suggest you make lens correction the first step after your raw-processing workflow. Thank you for the link! It sounded like PT lens was a good solution, until I read this: I think I’m better off the optical correction pre-set when I’m using lenses that my Leica doesn’t recognize. Most of the time the 50mm Summicron is mounted on my M10, so most of the time the lens information DxO sees will be correct. The old lens are not better or worse, just “different”, and they are also smaller and lighter.
It’s inconvenient, but I don’t want to spend thousands of dollars each for modern Leica lenses, when I am satisfied with my old lenses. But, I should have turned that off when I mounted my 15mm Voigtlander. I manually entered the ID number for my 50mm Summicron. Yes, Leica allows users to manually enter the lens ID for lenses made before the lens coding system was developed. That’s your issue and I don’t know how to get around it. However in your case, Leica “cheats” and puts a manually-entered lens ID in the EXIF.
0 kommentar(er)
